Gaming pet peeves that need to die by fire Part 1

There are a number of game mechanics I see pop up in even the best of games, some old, some new, all really really annoying. I'm making a list of my gaming pet peeves and why they should die in a fiery blaze already. Here is part 1.  Do you share the same pet-peeves?

1) Escort Missions


You are a big badass bruiser and you have to protect the dainty princess while she walks through the monster infested minefield. Or you have to keep your cousin's outhouse from taking too many hits from missile fire while he drops his morning load. Either way, you have to babysit some weakling who can barely breathe unless you help him out.
Why it was made: When you're an unstoppable killing machine with all the weapons, ammo and upgrades you could ever want, it can get boring fighting enemies who could never hope to hit you. How do game designers fix that? Introduce an element that isn't impervious to bullets! Protect the princess! Stop the house from falling down! Now it's more of a challenge because you don't just have to look after yourself, you have to keep someone else from dying.
Why it should die by fire: STOP EXPLODING YOU COWARDS!! The biggest problem with the escort mission is that more times than most, the AI is not smart enough to look after himself, and also doesn't have enough health to accommodate his stupidity. If a producer or designer isn't' smart enough NOT to have an escort mission, he also usually doesn't have enough money to give him good AI.  Even if he doesn't blindly walk into gunfire, it's still annoying when a mercenary jumps out of nowhere and your target dies when there was little you could do. It is never fun looking after someone else who doesn't have the common sense to look after themselves. And you want your player to have fun, right? Because this isn't fun, it's a chore. 

It's babysitting. Looking after yourself is one thing, but having to look after someone else, and punishing the player for their AI's stupidity is offensive. I was recently playing Fallout 3 and had to reload a save five times because a band of AI smugglers would go through town, and seek out the only merchant to kill them. And this is a game where death is real, so why are you punishing the player for something that was not his fault? Why should I not be able to trade when your merchant is not smart enough to duck and your smugglers are too dumb to realize they would have no one to sell their smuggled merchandise too?
How to fix it: Ok, you don't want to kill Escort missions because they're classic and you're some sort of Sadist. Fine. Then let's look at the only two examples of games where the escort mission is acceptable: Resident Evil 4 and Ico. I'm amazed that not only does it work, it's part of the core gameplay. How do they fix it? Well first of all, they escortee is not dumb. Yorda will stay when you tell her to, come when she's called, and help you out with your puzzles. Ashley ducks instinctively when when a gun is pointed at her, and if all else fails you can tell her to go hide in a trash can. But the best part of both of these is that you don't have to watch their health. Ashley has a health bar, but, like Yorda, most times she's just carried away, giving you ample time to rescue her. Don't give your target a health bar, make her smart, and give the player ample time to rescue her.

2) First Person Jumping Puzzles


If you have a jump button, you can bet your sweet Jamaican ass there's going to be a jump puzzle. Otherwise, what's the point of even having a jump button? It couldn't be just for a sense of atmosphere and because you don't really have a sense of flipping or diving in first person adventures, right?

Why it was made: "hmm, we put a jump feature in our first person shooter, we should probably use that for something, right? Also our levels are getting kind of stale, let's make it...interesting."

Why it should die by fire: The problem with first person jumping is because you can't see the body, it's incredibly difficult to gauge how far away from the edge you are without looking directly down, and it doesn't help that some games have a delay ont he jump for "realism". They're trying to make it a more exciting experience by having the jumping be in first person, but they're forgetting all the input people have in real life that they don't have in games. Sound, touch, a sense of balance and where you are in the world, all of those are made up for in third person, but in first person it just comes down to guessing, and taking a leap of faith(pun intended).

How to fix it: Easy, DON'T HAVE A JUMP BUTTON. This is why I love Timesplitters, because it was all about the running and gunning. What do you need to jump for? There have been loads of games, including Mass Effect, that don't have a jump button at all, but instead have an "interact" button that lets you climb certain objects. If you want to have a jump, don't make it so easy for people to die, like in Portal, in which you ca whip around 'til your heart's content unless you fall in toxic goo.

3) Invisible Walls/invisible barriers


They want to have a big flowing landscape, but there are some places where you're not allowed to go, and why ruin that view with actual walls?

Why it was made: To restrict the player. Or more to the point, to to keep the player from going out of the bounds of the game but they couldn't think of anything more creative.

Why it should die by fire: Invisible walls are the laziest possible way you can keep a player on the route you want them to take. It is saying "You can't go here because we haven't finished that part of the game, but, I don't know, just stop because we said so." I was playing Fallout 3(honest guys it's a good game), exploring the edges of the landscape when I was suddenly struck with a message that said "You cannot go this way, please go back." Well why the hell can't I go that way? It's a road and I got legs, don't I? What's most annoying is that there were actual routes within the game world I couldn't go because of buildings, steep mountains or giant heaping piles of debris. Why couldn't they box in the edges with that?!

How to fix it: Here's an idea, HAVE REAL WALLS!  But hey, if logic is not your thing, make up a reason that makes sense in the gameworld why they can't go further. Maybe after awhile it gets too radioactive, or as in the first Mass Effect with the Mako, you start to lose the com-signal. Maybe you can only go so high with a jet because you start to lose control from the high altitude.  Maybe there's a monster that instakills you as soon as you step out of the borders. We have the technology to implement these things, we just have to put in the time and effort to implement them.

4) The Locked Door That Has No Business Being Locked


You need to get to the super duper death machine to turn it off, but, oh noes the door is locked! The regular door with a simple lock. When you have a gun. And a crowbar. And a rocket launcher. Welp, guess you better go all the way across the level to get the key, right?


Why it was made: How do you create tension in a story? keep the protagonist from their objective. The easiest way to do that is with a locked door. It's easy enough to program a locked door in games, and it will extend the quest a few hours if you make the player hunt for a key.

Why it should die by fire: I have a rocket launcher and 5 grenades, this is piece of metal and glass barely 2 inches deep with a small locking mechanism. What is so hard about that? Oh I have to go search for a key? Who the hell puts a key to a door on the other side of the compound? Who built this place?! And are these regular plaster walls?  It can be even worse if destroying/breaking a door was part of an objective earlier.

How to fix it: I would love LOVE a game that gave you a locked door, told you you had to get a key, but then you have the option of breaking the door down anyways. Would anyone try it because they've been conditioned that all doors unless otherwise noted are unbreakable? If you want a locked door, ether the player should not have any way of opening it up, or it should be a much much sturdier door. Why not use this opportunity to have different ways of opening the door? Because we are tired of fetch quests. Use the shotgun to break the glass and unlock the door from the other side! Use the crowbar to force the door open! Maybe if you break the door, the supports will give way and the whole building will topple. Maybe there's a magic force field, or it's a laser grid and you need to turn off the power. All of these are viable options. Get creative!

The animated misadventures of Brother Rabbit and Acquaintances

So hey, remember when I said I was getting back into animation? I am making an animated version of Brother Rabbit and Acquaintances. 

I have recorded audio, made storyboards and an animatic, created character sheets, and am now in the actual animation phase! Here are some character sheets!

Wrath of the boards

I have some fancy new things to show! Not a lot becuase I've been working on some stuff I want to keep under wraps and also been busy retooling my resume and such, but I do have some stuff related to Sketched Screenings!

Look at that beautiful storyboard! So many lines, but so worth it!

Birds of Prey Redesign

Hey I did a redesign of the Birds of Prey over at Superhero of the Month!

movies and sketches

Hey! I haven't been around for awhile. Been working on Sketched Screenings and other projects that I shall reveal soon. But for now, sketches!  First up, some sketches from Sketched Screenings:

An adorable Ghost Rider sketch from my Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance!

Friday Night Links

Something else different, I wanted to share a few awesome links to great tutorials and articles I found throughout the week!

To start it up, here's a blog from #AltDevBlogADay about constraints in design and how to keep it simple. It ranges from writing, to art, to game design:

Constraint Based Design

Also from #AltDevBlogADay is this article on novelty vs. Familiarity. Basically, for someone to like something, it needs to feel familiar, but not so familiar that it's boring. You should also read his article on a functioning definition of beauty.

The Novelty Vs. Familiarity Complex

From Gamasutra, here's a nice article about five problems in adventure games and how to fix them. At the bottom of the post he has a number of other articles that I also recommend.

5 Adventure Game Goofs(and How to Fix Them)

Talented artist Grace Fong has some great exercises for artists to try out, and check out the rest of her blog for beautiful art and other helpful exercises!

Helpful Exercises for All

And then there's this, which is no tutorial or useful in any way, but if you slightly follow politics, and strongly dislike the candidate of Rick Santorum, then list of minor annoyances that people wish on him will fill you with glee.

ihopericksantorum.tumblr.com/

What other articles and tutorials did you guys find?

AI are suicide bombers

Oh hey, I wanted to do something a little different.  I wrote a blogpost about videogames!

You ever play a fighter or shooter, something where your player character has to go up aginst a large number of enemies, he picks them all off, there's only one or two left, and you wonder why they still come at you? Even after you've just decimated their whole squad?  For example in every Batman game, every thug will run at you with whatever he has in his hands, even though he knows this is the Batman and and he's beat up thousands of thugs. Or take any shooter, you've taken out 20 squad guys, but that last guy still thinks he can take you on.

I'm sure that guy with the TV is just trying to get better reception.

Doesn't this seem weird and out of place? It doesn't make sense in the context of the real world, does it?  Sure for a few cases it can be explained that these are all mindless monsters or robots, or hardened soldiers who are all willing to die for their cause, but for most people, common sense would dictate you run the hell away, right?

That's because in the real world, humans are genially programmed to survive. Unless they're all elite squad commandos ready to die for their squad, or some sort of religious fanatic who would rather die for the cause, the logical response to seeing 20 guys taken out is to run and/or hide. That's because we have lives, we have other things to do other than fight, we have other reasons that we're fighting for, and we have a base need to survive, whatever the cost.  Some cases would dictate that the best way to survive would be to fight, but other cases would dictate the best way would be to run away.

Game AI are not built like that. They don't have lives or any outside functions, and they're programmed only to fight.  Their only function in life is to kill the player, they have no other greater purpose or dreams or desires.  They are kamikazes. They are not programmed to care whether they live or die in any given situation.  And in some cases, as in with respawnable monsters or lego people who are all virtually indestructible, they have no reason to care.

This is a thing that happened. If lego people are indestructible, how did Batman's parents die?

Game developers may find this is pretty self explanatory, but think about what this means and what we can do with this. What if we made AI that was programmed to survive? What would that mean? Would they get stronger or more fierce if they were cornered and alone instead of with their group? Could the player scare them all off by taking out one guy really brutally? Maybe if the player killed the majority of enemies, the last one would go "oh shit!" and book it, never to be seen again? Think about how we could make games more realistic and change the player experience.  What then would the player do when faced with an enemy who runs away? Would they give chase or let them go? How would that impact the rest of the game or the personality of the player's character?

Just some things to think about.